Journal Home
Search for

Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 219-224 (April 2006)


View previous. 6 of 13 View next.

Expectation of pain replicates the effect of pain in a hand laterality recognition task: Bias in information processing toward the painful side?

Megan L. Hudson, Katherine McCormick, Nadia Zalucki, G. Lorimer MoseleyCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 26 October 2004; accepted 18 March 2005.

Abstract 

Background

People in pain, or expecting pain, sometimes bias their attention towards pain-relevant cues. Perhaps they also bias their attention towards the body part in question.

Aim

To determine if experimentally induced pain, and the expectation of pain, involve an information processing bias towards the hand in question.

Methods

Seventeen asymptomatic subjects performed a hand laterality recognition task during three conditions: control, during hand pain induced by intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline (pain), and during expectation of hand pain, induced by isotonic saline injection (expectation). Mean response time (RT) was determined for three 45 s epochs within each condition and RT was compared between hands, conditions and epochs using a 2×3×3 repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance.

Results

There was a hand×condition interaction and a hand×condition×epoch interaction (p<0.05 for both). RT to recognise the opposite hand was ∼600ms longer during epochs when subjects were in pain or expected pain than during control trials. During those epochs, RT to recognise the opposite hand was ∼600ms longer than RT to recognise the injected hand, which was consistent across conditions and across epochs.

Conclusions

Both pain and the expectation of pain increased RT to recognise the opposite hand. The findings are consistent with a bias in information processing toward the painful or impending painful hand.

Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland & School of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 9351 9312; fax: +61 2 9351 9601.

PII: S1090-3801(05)00044-3

doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.03.009


View previous. 6 of 13 View next.