Journal Home
Search for

Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1040-1046 (November 2008)


View previous. 10 of 15 View next.

Sustained-release oral morphine versus transdermal fentanyl and oral methadone in cancer pain management

Sebastiano MercadanteabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Giampiero Porzioc, Patrizia Ferreraa, Fabio Fulfaroc, Federica Aiellic, Lucilla Vernac, Patrizia Villaria, Corrado Ficorellac, Vittorio Gebbiad, Salvatore Riinaa, Alessandra Casuccioe, Salvatore Mangioneb

Received 22 August 2007; received in revised form 28 January 2008; accepted 28 January 2008. published online 19 March 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic and adverse effects, doses, as well as cost of opioid drugs, supportive drug therapy and other analgesic drugs in patients treated with oral sustained-release morphine, transdermal fentanyl, and oral methadone.

Patients and methods

One hundred and eight cancer patients, no longer responsive to opioids for moderate pain, were selected to randomly receive initial daily doses of 60mg of oral sustained-release morphine, 15mg of oral methadone, or 0.6mg (25μg/h) of transdermal fentanyl. Oral morphine was used as breakthrough pain medication during opioid titration. Opioid doses, pain intensity, adverse effects, symptomatic drugs, were recorded at week intervals for 4weeks. Costs of opioid therapy, supportive drugs, and other analgesic drugs were also evaluated.

Results

Seventy patients completed the 4weeks period of study. Five, five, and four patients, treated with oral morphine, transdermal fentanyl, and oral methadone, respectively, required opioid switching. No differences in pain and symptom intensity were observed. Opioid escalation index was significantly lower in patients receiving methadone (p<0.0001), although requiring up and down changes in doses. At the doses used, methadone was significantly less expensive (p<0.0001), while the use and costs of supportive drugs and other analgesics were similar in the three groups. No relevant differences in adverse effects were observed among the groups during either the titration phase and chronic treatment.

Conclusion

All the three opioids used as first-line therapy were effective, well tolerated, and required similar amounts of symptomatic drugs or co-analgesics. Methadone was significantly less expensive, but required more changes, up and down, of the doses, suggesting that dose titration of this drug requires major clinical expertise.

a Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146 Palermo, Italy

b Palliative Medicine – Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, University of Palermo, Italy

c Department of Oncology, University of Palermo, Italy

d Department of Oncology, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Italy

e Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0916806521; fax: +39 0916806110.

PII: S1090-3801(08)00022-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.013


View previous. 10 of 15 View next.