Journal Home
Search for

Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 870.e1-870.e9 (September 2010)


View previous. 15 of 18 View next.

Pain-related fear predicts disability, but not pain severity: A path analytic approach of the fear-avoidance model

Els L.M. Gheldofa, Geert CrombezbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Eva Van den Busschec, Jan Vincka, An Van Nieuwenhuysede, Guido Moensdf, Philippe Mairiauxg, Johan W.S. Vlaeyenhi

Received 10 July 2009; received in revised form 17 December 2009; accepted 17 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Abstract 

Two studies are reported that tested the fear-avoidance (FA) model using path analytic techniques. In study 1, 429 employees with back pain at baseline and back pain at 18months follow-up completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic information, pain severity, negative affect, pain-related fear, and disability. Results indicated that pain severity at baseline predicted pain-related fear and disability at follow-up, and that pain-related fear is rather a consequence than an antecedent of pain severity. Results further revealed that the disposition to experience negative affect has a low impact upon pain severity and disability, and is best viewed as a precursor of pain-related fear. Study 2 included 238 employees without back pain at baseline, but who developed back pain at 1year follow-up. A similar model as in study 1 was tested. Overall, results are in line with those of study 1. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical relevance and clinical implications.

a Research Group of Health Psychology, Hasselt University, Belgium

b Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium

c Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven – Campus Kortrijk, Belgium

d Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational, Environmental and Insurance Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium

e Department of Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium

f Occupational Health Services IDEWE, Leuven, Belgium

g Department of Occupational Health and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Liège, Belgium

h Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

i Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 2646461; fax: +32 9 2646489.

PII: S1090-3801(10)00021-2

doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.01.003


View previous. 15 of 18 View next.